Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:04:23 -0800 | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt |
| |
On 11/06/13 04:07, Vinayak Kale wrote: > This patch series adds support to handle interrupt registration/deregistration > in arm64 pmu driver when pmu interrupt type is percpu. > > Patches in this patch series were previously sent out as separate patches [1]. > This patch series incorporates comments/fixes suggested for original patches. > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/205888.html > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/204414.html > > Vinayak Kale (2): > genirq: error reporting in request_percpu_irq() and > request_threaded_irq() > arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt > > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > kernel/irq/manage.c | 12 +++-- > 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) >
What ever happened to the approach here[1]? It doesn't look very nice to have to request the irq first as a per-cpu interrupt and then try as a non-percpu interrupt when genirq already knows if its per-cpu or not.
[1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1207.3/02955.html
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
| |