Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 6 Nov 2013 06:40:48 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 1/8] locking: Move mutex into kernel/locking/ |
| |
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:26:38PM -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/Makefile > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/Makefile > > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/Makefile > > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ obj-y = fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o > > > sysctl.o sysctl_binary.o capability.o ptrace.o timer.o user.o \ > > > signal.o sys.o kmod.o workqueue.o pid.o task_work.o \ > > > extable.o params.o posix-timers.o \ > > > - kthread.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \ > > > + kthread.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o \ > > > hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o semaphore.o \ > > > notifier.o ksysfs.o cred.o reboot.o \ > > > async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o > > > > This is probably a stupid question, but I haven't been able to find > > one kernel version that this applies cleanly over ??? > > Oh my bad, it appears I made it against a working tree, not an actual > published tree. That said, I don't think the rejects should be super > hard to fix. > > If people don't object to the idea I'll respin against something > published and testable.
Please do it against the locking tree (tip:core/locking), it has pending changes plus v3.12 as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
|  |