lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/10] perf hists: Consolidate __hists__add_*entry()
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 05:16:04PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:52:43 +0000, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:09:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> @@ -486,15 +425,15 @@ struct hist_entry *__hists__add_entry(struct hists *hists,
> >> .ip = al->addr,
> >> .level = al->level,
> >> .stat = {
> >> - .period = period,
> >> .nr_events = 1,
> >> + .period = period,
> >> .weight = weight,
> >> },
> >
> > Isn't this seems unrelated and unneeded ?
> >
> > The "period" field is before the "nr_events" field in the struct, so maybe is
> > more clear to leave it as it was ? The actual relative order (it has some more
> > fields) in the struct is: period, weigth, nr_events. Might be better if they
> > match that order here ? Although not sure since we are using the fields with
> > name and is clear enough.
>
> Yes, it just a small unrelated cosmetic change. I don't think the order
> matters much - it just makes my eyes a bit more comfortable. :)
>
> IOW, I changed it since _add_branch_entry() and _add_mem_entry() do it
> slightly different order. So I decided to clean it up and putting
> nr_events at first looked reasonable to me.

Great, sounds reasonable to me too :)




Thangs again,
Rodrigo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-06 10:21    [W:0.336 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site