Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:02:19 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] block: Revert bio_clone() default behaviour | From | Olof Johansson <> |
| |
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com> wrote:
> Chris, Olaf, can you two in particular test this? I have tested the bounce > buffer code (and bcache), but Jens told me today there was an md bug that I > _still_ can't find any emails about so I'm not sure what to test for that.
(I'm guessing you mean me and not some German person here. :-)
What is this expected to apply on top of? It doesn't apply cleanly on the 20131105 -next tree which is where I had been seeing the issues.
-Olof
| |