lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 1/8] locking: Move mutex into kernel/locking/
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:26:38PM -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ obj-y = fork.o exec_domain.o panic.o
> > sysctl.o sysctl_binary.o capability.o ptrace.o timer.o user.o \
> > signal.o sys.o kmod.o workqueue.o pid.o task_work.o \
> > extable.o params.o posix-timers.o \
> > - kthread.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o mutex.o \
> > + kthread.o sys_ni.o posix-cpu-timers.o \
> > hrtimer.o rwsem.o nsproxy.o semaphore.o \
> > notifier.o ksysfs.o cred.o reboot.o \
> > async.o range.o groups.o lglock.o smpboot.o
>
> This is probably a stupid question, but I haven't been able to find
> one kernel version that this applies cleanly over ???

Oh my bad, it appears I made it against a working tree, not an actual
published tree. That said, I don't think the rejects should be super
hard to fix.

If people don't object to the idea I'll respin against something
published and testable.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-05 22:41    [W:0.055 / U:19.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site