[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] mm: thp: give transparent hugepage code a separate copy_page
On 10/28/2013 03:11 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:16:20PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> void copy_huge_page(struct page *dst, struct page *src)
>> {
>> struct hstate *h = page_hstate(src);
>> if (unlikely(pages_per_huge_page(h) > MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES)) {
>> ...
>> This patch creates a copy_high_order_page() which can
>> be used on THP pages.
> We already have copy_user_huge_page() and copy_user_gigantic_page() in
> generic code (mm/memory.c). I think copy_gigantic_page() and
> copy_huge_page() should be moved there too.

That would be fine I guesss... in another patch. :)

> BTW, I think pages_per_huge_page in copy_user_huge_page() is redunand:
> compound_order(page) should be enough, right?

The way it is now, the compiler can optimize for the !HUGETLBFS case.
Also, pages_per_huge_page() works for gigantic pages. compound_order()
wouldn't work for those.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-05 20:21    [W:0.057 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site