lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] per anon_vma lock and turn anon_vma rwsem lock to rwlock_t
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:10:43AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:44:00PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 11:59 +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 08:15:13PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 18:16 +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:21:46AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Btw., another _really_ interesting comparison would be against
> > > > > > > > the latest rwsem patches. Mind doing such a comparison?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sure. Where can I get it? Are they on some git tree?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've Cc:-ed Tim Chen who might be able to point you to the latest
> > > > > > version.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The last on-lkml submission was in this thread:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Subject: [PATCH v8 0/9] rwsem performance optimizations
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > I queued bunchs of tests about one hour ago, and already got some
> > > > > results(If necessary, I can add more data tomorrow when those tests are
> > > > > finished):
> > > >
> > > > What kind of system are you using to run these workloads on?
> > >
> > > I queued jobs on 5 testboxes:
> > > - brickland1: 120 core Ivybridge server
> > > - lkp-ib03: 48 core Ivybridge server
> > > - lkp-sb03: 32 core Sandybridge server
> > > - lkp-nex04: 64 core NHM server
> > > - lkp-a04: Atom server
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > v3.12-rc7 fe001e3de090e179f95d
> > > > > ------------------------ ------------------------
> > > > > -9.3% brickland1/micro/aim7/shared
> > > > > +4.3% lkp-ib03/micro/aim7/fork_test
> > > > > +2.2% lkp-ib03/micro/aim7/shared
> > > > > -2.6% TOTAL aim7.2000.jobs-per-min
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry if I'm missing something, but could you elaborate more on what
> > > > these percentages represent?
> > >
> > > v3.12-rc7 fe001e3de090e179f95d
> > > ------------------------ ------------------------
> > > -9.3% brickland1/micro/aim7/shared
> > > ....
> > > ....
> > > -2.6% TOTAL aim7.2000.jobs-per-min
> > >
> > > The comparation base is v3.12-rc7, and we got 9.3 performance regression
> > > at commit fe001e3de090e179f95d, which is the head of rwsem performance
> > > optimizations patch set.
> >
> > Yunahan, thanks for the data. This I assume is with the entire rwsem
> > v8 patchset.
>
> Yes, it is; 9 patches in total.
>
> > Any idea of the run variation on the workload?
>
> Your concern is right. The variation is quite big on the brickland1/micro/aim7/shared
> testcase.
>
> * - v3.12-rc7
> O - fe001e3de090e179f95d
>
> brickland1/micro/aim7/shared: aim7.2000.jobs-per-min
>
> 320000 ++----------------------------------------------------------------+
> | |
> 310000 ++ .*......... |
> | .... ....... |
> 300000 ++ .... ....... |
> | ... ...... |
> 290000 ++ .... ...|
> | .... *
> 280000 ++ ... |
> | .... |
> 270000 ++.... |
> *. O
> 260000 O+ |
> | O |
> 250000 ++----------------------------------------------------------------+
>

Tim,

Please ignore this "regression", it disappears when I run that testcase
6 times both for v3.12-rc7 and fe001e3de090e179f95d.

I guess 2000 users is a bit small for 120 core IVB server. I may try to
increase the user count and do test again to see how it will behavior
with your patches applied.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

--yliu



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-05 16:01    [W:0.105 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site