Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:31:01 +0800 | From | Li Zefan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: Allow NR_CPUS=1024 |
| |
On 2013/11/5 14:25, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > >> On 11/04/2013 12:11 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 8192 maybe? >>> >>> Yeah, that makes more sense I guess. >>> >> >> However, I still have serious issues with crap like this because >> randconfig is basically broken. If nothing else we need to get that >> feedback to the kconfig maintainers. > > The problem with that is that there are no kconfig maintainers: >
Yes, there is.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/30/124
Though I don't know if the new maintainer will help in this issue.
> KCONFIG > ... > S: Odd Fixes > > The kconfig code is still a hard to maintain, scarcely documented mess. It > took us almost a decade to rescue the NTP code from a similar obfuscation > trap and make it maintainable. It had the same author as the original > Kconfig code - and the Kconfig code is 10 times larger than the NTP code. > > Thanks, >
|  |