lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: Allow NR_CPUS=1024
On 2013/11/5 14:25, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/04/2013 12:11 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 8192 maybe?
>>>
>>> Yeah, that makes more sense I guess.
>>>
>>
>> However, I still have serious issues with crap like this because
>> randconfig is basically broken. If nothing else we need to get that
>> feedback to the kconfig maintainers.
>
> The problem with that is that there are no kconfig maintainers:
>

Yes, there is.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/30/124

Though I don't know if the new maintainer will help in this issue.

> KCONFIG
> ...
> S: Odd Fixes
>
> The kconfig code is still a hard to maintain, scarcely documented mess. It
> took us almost a decade to rescue the NTP code from a similar obfuscation
> trap and make it maintainable. It had the same author as the original
> Kconfig code - and the Kconfig code is 10 times larger than the NTP code.
>
> Thanks,
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-05 07:41    [W:0.068 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site