On 11/04/2013 12:11 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > >> 8192 maybe? > > Yeah, that makes more sense I guess. >
However, I still have serious issues with crap like this because randconfig is basically broken. If nothing else we need to get that feedback to the kconfig maintainers.