lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Generic WorkQueue Engine (GenWQE) device driver (v4)
From
Date
Hi Greg,

Am Mittwoch, den 30.10.2013, 10:44 -0700 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:32:58AM +0100, Frank Haverkamp wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Create device_attribute structures / params: name, mode, show, store
> > + * additional flag if valid in VF
> > + */
> > +struct genwqe_dev_attrib {
> > + struct device_attribute att; /* sysfs entry attributes */
> > + int vf; /* may exist in VF or not */
> > +};
>
> Why do you need your own structure? Use the is_visible() callback to
> create or not, the individual attributes for a specific device, don't
> roll your own logic for something the driver core already supports.
>
> > +static struct genwqe_dev_attrib dev_attr_tab[] = {
> > + {__ATTR(tempsens, S_IRUGO, show_card_tempsens, NULL), 0},
> > + {__ATTR(next_bitstream, (S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR),
> > + show_card_next_bitstream, store_card_next_bitstream), 0},
> > + {__ATTR(curr_bitstream, S_IRUGO, show_card_curr_bitstream, NULL), 0},
> > + {__ATTR(cpld_version, S_IRUGO, show_cpld_version, NULL), 0},
> > + {__ATTR(base_clock, S_IRUGO, show_card_base_clock, NULL), 0},
> > +
> > + {__ATTR(driver, S_IRUGO, show_card_driver, NULL), 1},
> > + {__ATTR(type, S_IRUGO, show_card_type, NULL), 1},
> > + {__ATTR(version, S_IRUGO, show_card_version, NULL), 1},
> > + {__ATTR(appid, S_IRUGO, show_card_appid, NULL), 1},
> > + {__ATTR(status, S_IRUGO, show_card_status, NULL), 1},
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * create_card_sysfs() - Setup sysfs entries of the card device
> > + *
> > + * VFs have restricted mmio capabilities, so not all sysfs entries
> > + * are allowed in VFs.
> > + */
> > +int create_card_sysfs(struct genwqe_dev *cd)
> > +{
> > + int rc, priv;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + priv = genwqe_is_privileged(cd);
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev_attr_tab); i++) {
> > + struct genwqe_dev_attrib *dev_attr = &dev_attr_tab[i];
> > + if (dev_attr->vf || priv) {
> > + rc = device_create_file(cd->dev, &dev_attr->att);
>
> No, you just raced with userspace, creating the sysfs files _after_ it
> was told to userspace that the driver was bound to the device.

> Please use the attribute groups for this driver to have the driver core
> create the files before it it told to userspace.

The code got a little smaller now, which is good. I introduced the usage
of is_visible(), but wondered if it really makes sense for my driver.
Alternatively I thought I could use something like this:

if (genwqe_is_privileged(cd))
sysfs_create_group(&cd->dev->kobj, &genwqe_attribute_group);
else
sysfs_create_group(&cd->dev->kobj,
&genwqe_normal_attribute_group);



> Also, instead of using __ATTR(), please use DEVICE_ATTR_RO(), it makes
> things easier to audit and saves me from having to change it later on
> (I'm doing a tree-wide change of this type of thing...)

Ok.

I stumbled across your article:
http://kroah.com/log/blog/2013/06/26/how-to-create-a-sysfs-file-correctly/

I am using sysfs_create_group() now, but do I understand you correctly
that setting the const struct attribute_group **groups; in my device
(where in my struct pci_device.dev?) is an even better way to establish
my sysfs attributes? Is there a function which I could call rather than
trying to find the right pointer?

> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Regards

Frank



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-04 18:21    [W:0.083 / U:0.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site