Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:00:39 +0200 | Subject | Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 1/2] userns: Better restrictions on when proc and sysfs can be mounted | From | Janne Karhunen <> |
| |
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> And another question, it looks like if we don't have proc/sys fs mounted, > then proc/sys will be failed to be mounted?
I have been wondering the same. Was quite some illogical surprise that we have to be doing overlay mounts. This is the exact opposite from what anyone would expect.
-- Janne
| |