lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the imx-mxs tree
On 11/04/2013 08:36 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:15:50AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 11/04/2013 07:17 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:27:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the dt-rh tree got a conflict in
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt between commit
>>>> 064d7f6c985a ("ARM: dts: Add vendor prefix for Voipac Technologies
>>>> s.r.o") from the imx-mxs tree and commit d6c3073e7fb5 ("DT: sort
>>>> vendor-prefixes.txt") from the dt-rh tree.
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Would you like to apply the patch "ARM: dts: Add vendor prefix for
>>> Voipac Technologies s.r.o" on your tree, so that we can save this
>>> conflict? If so, I will drop the patch from my tree. Just let me know.
>>
>> Unless it is the top commit, it is best to not rebase your tree.
>
> I'm queuing the patch for 3.14, and my branch will be rebased to
> 3.13-rc anyway.
>
> Are you queuing "DT: sort vendor-prefixes.txt" for 3.13 or 3.14? If
> it's for 3.13, we will be fine, since the conflict will be solved on my
> side when my branch gets rebased to 3.13-rc.

It is for 3.13.

Rob



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-04 16:01    [W:0.032 / U:4.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site