Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:24:19 -0800 | From | Tony Lindgren <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: single: fix pcs_disable with bits_per_mux |
| |
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [131130 09:08]: > * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [131128 04:01]: > > On 11/28/2013 01:29 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > pcs_enable() uses vals->mask instead of pcs->fmask when bits_per_mux is > > > enabled. However, pcs_disable() always uses pcs->fmask. > > > > > > Fix pcs_disable() to use vals->mask with bits_per_mux. > > > > I wonder how did I missed this? > > Probably because the disable can be a nop for some hardware. > > > Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Linus W, might be worth also mentioning the regression causing commit here. Commit 9e605cb68a21d5 (pinctrl: pinctrl-single: Add pinctrl-single,bits type of mux) added support for multiple muxes in a single register, but forgot to modify pcs_disable() function the same way as pcs_enable() was modified.
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > > > index 829b98c5c66f..174f4c50cd77 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > > > @@ -525,12 +525,18 @@ static void pcs_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned fselector, > > > for (i = 0; i < func->nvals; i++) { > > > struct pcs_func_vals *vals; > > > unsigned long flags; > > > - unsigned val; > > > + unsigned val, mask; > > > > > > vals = &func->vals[i]; > > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pcs->lock, flags); > > > val = pcs->read(vals->reg); > > > - val &= ~pcs->fmask; > > > + > > > + if (pcs->bits_per_mux) > > > + mask = vals->mask; > > > + else > > > + mask = pcs->fmask; > > > + > > > + val &= ~mask; > > > val |= pcs->foff << pcs->fshift; > > > pcs->write(val, vals->reg); > > > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcs->lock, flags); > > > > > > > > > -- > > Péter > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |