Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Nov 2013 16:38:13 -0500 (EST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] inet: fix possible seqlock deadlocks | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:09:14 +0100
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:51:22AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> >> >> In commit c9e9042994d3 ("ipv4: fix possible seqlock deadlock") I left >> another places where IP_INC_STATS_BH() were improperly used. >> >> udp_sendmsg(), ping_v4_sendmsg() and tcp_v4_connect() are called from >> process context, not from softirq context. >> >> This was detected by lockdep seqlock support. >> >> Reported-by: jongman heo <jongman.heo@samsung.com> >> Fixes: 584bdf8cbdf6 ("[IPV4]: Fix "ipOutNoRoutes" counter error for TCP and UDP") >> Fixes: c319b4d76b9e ("net: ipv4: add IPPROTO_ICMP socket kind") >> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> >> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> > > Just got home after getting distracted with other things today and the work is > already done. Thanks, Eric! ;) > > Exactly the spots I noticed this morning, so > > Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Applied and queued up for -stable.
| |