Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:02:10 -0500 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]: exec: avoid propagating PF_NO_SETAFFINITY into userspace child |
| |
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 03:57:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Do you have a better definition that doesn't get in the way of people > wanting to do actual work?
As written multiple times now, workqueue does have per-workqueue attributes and if you really want a dedicated worker thread, use a dedicated kthread.
> So far I just see you breaking existing setups because you don't want to > support things that work perfectly well.
It doesn't work as explained multiple times in this thread.
-- tejun
|  |