[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]: exec: avoid propagating PF_NO_SETAFFINITY into userspace child
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 03:57:55PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Do you have a better definition that doesn't get in the way of people
> wanting to do actual work?

As written multiple times now, workqueue does have per-workqueue
attributes and if you really want a dedicated worker thread, use a
dedicated kthread.

> So far I just see you breaking existing setups because you don't want to
> support things that work perfectly well.

It doesn't work as explained multiple times in this thread.


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-28 17:21    [W:0.079 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site