Re: [PATCH]: exec: avoid propagating PF_NO_SETAFFINITY into userspace child
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 02:31:52PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > I _guess_ usermodehelper_init() should use WQ_SYSFS then, and in this case > the user can write to wq_cpumask_store somewhere in /sys/.
WTF is that and why are we creating alternative affinity interfaces when sched_setaffinity() is a prefectly fine one?