Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:31:52 +0100 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]: exec: avoid propagating PF_NO_SETAFFINITY into userspace child |
| |
On 11/28, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:45:42PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > It has? khelper is a workqueue thread, this flag is set by create_worker(). > > > > And it does kernel_thread() (not kthread_create()) so the child gets this > > flag too. > > Urgh, but that's still completely wrong. khelper is a singlethread > workqueue, those should be unbound and therefore should not have this > flag set at all.
Well. This is debatable, but I leave this to you and Tejun ;)
But:
> In fact, I know people want to set affinity on khelper
This is not that simple. Note that khelper itself is the rescuer thread, it doesn't not process the works. There are other kworker/u* threads which run the work queued on khelper_wq. There is a pool of threads.
> to ensure all the > usermode helper tasks get spawned on the specific system-cpus and leave > the rest of the system unperturbed.
I _guess_ usermodehelper_init() should use WQ_SYSFS then, and in this case the user can write to wq_cpumask_store somewhere in /sys/.
Not sure I read this code correctly though, I didn't check.
But PF_NO_SETAFFINITY should be cleared on exec anyway, so I still think the patch does the right thing.
Oleg.
|  |