lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 3/4] perf,x86: add Intel RAPL PMU support
From
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > So I notice PP1 (which is the GPU power on non-server chips)
>> > > is not supported.
>> > >
>> > > Is that just for simplicity?
>> > >
>> > Does it work on specific models only? I bet so. How to detect those?
>>
>> In general it is on the machines that don't support the DRAM measurements
>> (so the non-EP machines) but I don't know if there's a nice list anywhere.
>>
>> Intel manuals say:
>> For a client platform, PP1 domain refers to the power plane of a
>> specific device in the uncore. For server platforms, PP1 domain is not
>> supported,
>>
>> usually PP1 I think maps to the embedded GPU.
>
> It would indeed be nice to expose PP1 too via the same facility -
> Haswell and later spends some 40% of the CPU die on the integrated GPU
> and people end up using it.
>
My worry is to determine if the GPU is actually enabled or even present.
Using the x86_model may not be enough for that.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-28 14:01    [W:0.596 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site