Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Mark Brown <> | Date | Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:24:16 +0000 | Subject | [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function |
| |
From: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Simple code reorganisation so we can change the logic for deciding what full constraints are more easily.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 3fe13130baec..02fdf925bb56 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -119,6 +119,11 @@ static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev *rdev) return ""; } +static bool have_full_constraints(void) +{ + return has_full_constraints; +} + /** * of_get_regulator - get a regulator device node based on supply name * @dev: Device pointer for the consumer (of regulator) device @@ -1340,7 +1345,7 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device *dev, const char *id, * Assume that a regulator is physically present and enabled * even if it isn't hooked up and just provide a dummy. */ - if (has_full_constraints && allow_dummy) { + if (have_full_constraints() && allow_dummy) { pr_warn("%s supply %s not found, using dummy regulator\n", devname, id); @@ -3627,7 +3632,7 @@ int regulator_suspend_finish(void) if (error) ret = error; } else { - if (!has_full_constraints) + if (!have_full_constraints()) goto unlock; if (!ops->disable) goto unlock; @@ -3825,7 +3830,7 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void) if (!enabled) goto unlock; - if (has_full_constraints) { + if (have_full_constraints()) { /* We log since this may kill the system if it * goes wrong. */ rdev_info(rdev, "disabling\n"); -- 1.8.4.4
| |