lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/14] sched: add latency tracing for -deadline tasks.
    On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:46:00PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >
    > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
    >
    > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > > So why does GCC then behave like this:
    > >
    > > I think because its a much saner behaviour; also it might still be the
    > > spec actually says this, its a somewhat opaque text.
    > >
    > > Anyway, yes GCC seems to behave as we 'expect' it to; I just can't find
    > > the language spec actually guaranteeing this.
    >
    > So from C99 standard §6.7.8 (Initialization)/21:
    >
    > "If there are fewer initializers in a brace-enclosed list than
    > there are elements or members of an aggregate, or fewer characters
    > in a string literal used to initialize an array of known size than
    > there are elements in the array, the remainder of the aggregate
    > shall be initialized implicitly the same as objects that have static
    > storage duration."
    >
    > static initialization == zeroing in this case.

    Hurm for some reason I thought that was for static objects only.


    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-11-27 17:41    [W:2.803 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site