Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:01:53 +0000 | From | Russell King - ARM Linux <> | Subject | Re: clk: clk_round_rate() should return 0, not negative numbers, upon error |
| |
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 03:55:33PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Update the documentation for clk_round_rate() to state that it should > return 0 rather than a negative error code when it encounters an > error. This describes how the common clock framework currently works; > howeever, some clock code does not yet align to this. > > This change is to prepare for returning unsigned values from > clk_round_rate().
You really ought to document why this is being changed here, to help sell the change to parties who are not aware of the background. Otherwise, it just looks like a gratuitous API change.
| |