Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:18:58 +0000 | From | One Thousand Gnomes <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH tty-next 5/7] n_tty: Refactor input_available_p() by call site |
| |
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:01:56 -0500 Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> wrote:
> On 11/23/2013 07:26 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:23 -0500 > > Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> wrote: > > > >> Distinguish if caller is n_tty_poll() or n_tty_read(), and > >> set the read/wakeup threshold accordingly. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> > > > > Doh ignore previous.. yes that patch is right. I should pay attention to > > 0/7 8) > > Maybe I should add more to the commit message from the cover letter > description ?
Maybe I should just read the code more carefully 8).
Alan
| |