Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:41:24 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: IRQF_RESUME_EARLY and errors in dpm_suspend_noirq |
| |
On Sat 2013-11-23 22:25:48, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Hi Laxman, > > Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2013, 10:54:10 schrieb Laxman Dewangan: > > > I may be blind, but where get the early-irqs resumed in the error > > > path of dpm_suspend_noirq? > > > > > > When a suspend_noirq callback returns an error, dpm_resume_noirq gets > > > called, which only calls resume_device_irqs while the > > > suspend_device_irqs call in dpm_suspend_noirq suspends all irqs. So it > > > does not seem that the early-irqs get resumed at all in this case. > > > > I also faced same issue in our suspend failure path and posted fix > > sometime ago as > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/13/373 > > > > It is still under review.
If it helps, you can add my
Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |