Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] xen: enable vnuma for PV guest | From | Dario Faggioli <> | Date | Sat, 23 Nov 2013 17:48:47 +0100 |
| |
On mar, 2013-11-19 at 14:56 +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > The relevant bits in dummy_numa_init are in the error path of > xen_numa_init(). > > I do think this approach (using the provided API to setup the single > (dummy) node), is preferable to calling dummy_numa_init(). > > If I thought the hypervisor ABI was finalized, I'd be happy with this > series as-is -- the remaining issues are superficial. > So, David, in this regard, what do you think about these (and the following messages in the thread?
http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C528B7D350200007800104840@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C1384871712.19880.90.camel@Abyss%3E http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C528B885702000078001048CF@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C1384875772.15360.6.camel@Solace%3E http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/mid/%3C528B97C502000078001049AE@nat28.tlf.novell.com%3E
I think Jan has a point about how we are right now retrieving and treating the number of vnodes...
Thanks and Regards, Dario
-- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |