Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V3 2/2] f2fs: read contiguous sit entry pages by merging for mount performance | From | Jaegeuk Kim <> | Date | Sun, 24 Nov 2013 13:05:26 +0900 |
| |
Hi,
2013-11-23 (토), 10:53 +0800, Chao Yu: > Hi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 5:11 PM > > To: Chao Yu > > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; 谭姝 > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V3 2/2] f2fs: read contiguous sit entry pages by merging for mount performance > > > > Hi, > > > > Just one niptick. > > > > 2013-11-22 (금), 09:09 +0800, Chao Yu: > > > Previously we read sit entries page one by one, this method lost the chance > > > of reading contiguous page together. So we read pages as contiguous as > > > possible for better mount performance. > > > > > > change log: > > > o merge judgements/use 'Continue' or 'Break' instead of 'Goto' as Gu Zheng > > > suggested. > > > o add mark_page_accessed() before release page to delay VM reclaiming. > > > o remove '*order' for simplification of function as Jaegeuk Kim suggested. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com> > > > --- > > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > > fs/f2fs/segment.h | 2 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > index 8149eba..998e7d3 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/blkdev.h> > > > #include <linux/prefetch.h> > > > #include <linux/vmalloc.h> > > > +#include <linux/swap.h> > > > > > > #include "f2fs.h" > > > #include "segment.h" > > > @@ -1488,41 +1489,89 @@ static int build_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > > return restore_curseg_summaries(sbi); > > > } > > > > > > +static int ra_sit_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int start, int nrpages) > > > +{ > > > + struct address_space *mapping = sbi->meta_inode->i_mapping; > > > + struct page *page; > > > + block_t blk_addr, prev_blk_addr = 0; > > > + int sit_blk_cnt = SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi); > > > > Can we remove SIT_BLK_CNT by replacing with sit_i->sit_blocks? > > Because sit_i->sit_blocks is a multiple of segment size(i.e. 512/1024), > but we may use part of sit_blocks, not all of them. So it's waste to read > all of them. > What's your opinion?
Got it. It's right and we can avoid that. Thanks, :)
-- Jaegeuk Kim Samsung
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |