lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] CMA: Fix the phys_addr_t print types
On Saturday 23 November 2013 10:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:37:01PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Otherwise prints would truncate the variables on LPAE machines.
>>
>> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c | 9 ++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
>> index 165c2c2..b303a98 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
>> @@ -201,9 +201,8 @@ int __init dma_contiguous_reserve_area(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t base,
>> phys_addr_t alignment;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - pr_debug("%s(size %lx, base %08lx, limit %08lx)\n", __func__,
>> - (unsigned long)size, (unsigned long)base,
>> - (unsigned long)limit);
>> + pr_info("%s(size %pa, base %pa, limit %pa)\n", __func__,
>> + &size, &base, &limit);
>
> Why did you change the logging level of this message?
>
Opps... That was accidental. Will post updated version.

regards,
Santosh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-24 05:01    [W:0.073 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site