Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 23 Nov 2013 22:44:21 -0500 | From | Santosh Shilimkar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] CMA: Fix the phys_addr_t print types |
| |
On Saturday 23 November 2013 10:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:37:01PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Otherwise prints would truncate the variables on LPAE machines. >> >> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> >> --- >> drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c | 9 ++++----- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c >> index 165c2c2..b303a98 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c >> @@ -201,9 +201,8 @@ int __init dma_contiguous_reserve_area(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t base, >> phys_addr_t alignment; >> int ret = 0; >> >> - pr_debug("%s(size %lx, base %08lx, limit %08lx)\n", __func__, >> - (unsigned long)size, (unsigned long)base, >> - (unsigned long)limit); >> + pr_info("%s(size %pa, base %pa, limit %pa)\n", __func__, >> + &size, &base, &limit); > > Why did you change the logging level of this message? > Opps... That was accidental. Will post updated version.
regards, Santosh
| |