lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] futex: Wakeup optimizations
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 21:55 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: 
    > On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 16:56 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

    > > This patchset has also been tested on smaller systems for a variety of
    > > benchmarks, including java workloads, kernel builds and custom bang-the-hell-out-of
    > > hb locks programs. So far, no functional or performance regressions have been seen.
    > > Furthermore, no issues were found when running the different tests in the futextest
    > > suite: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dvhart/futextest.git/
    >
    > Excellent. Would you be able to contribute any of these (C only please)
    > to the stress test group?

    FWIW, I plugged this series into an rt kernel (extra raciness) and beat
    it up a bit on a 64 core box too. Nothing fell out, nor did futextest
    numbers change outside variance (poor box has 8 whole gig ram, single
    numa node, so kinda crippled/wimpy, and not good box for benchmarking).

    What concerned me most about the series was 5/5.. looks like a great
    idea to me, but the original thread did not have a happy ending.

    -Mike



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-11-23 08:01    [W:7.793 / U:0.780 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site