lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tty: replace mutex_lock() with tty_write_lock()
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:09:15AM +0100, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.11.2013 20:12, schrieb Andreas Platschek:
> > Use tty_write_lock()/tty_write_unlock() consistently.
> >
> > This takes care of the following sparse warning:
> > drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1169:17: warning: context imbalance in 'tty_write_message' - unexpected unlock
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Platschek <andi.platschek@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > index 3a1a01a..13dca92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > @@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ out:
> > void tty_write_message(struct tty_struct *tty, char *msg)
> > {
> > if (tty) {
> > - mutex_lock(&tty->atomic_write_lock);
> > + tty_write_lock(tty,0);
> > tty_lock(tty);
> > if (tty->ops->write && !test_bit(TTY_CLOSING, &tty->flags)) {
> > tty_unlock(tty);
>
> i am not an expert on this but you may need to replace that tty_unlock() with tty_write_unlock().

No. The original code is correct.

regards,
dan carpenter



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-22 10:01    [W:0.060 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site