Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:01:41 -0600 | From | Joel Fernandes <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/8] ARM: OMAP: Move public portion of dmtimer.h to include/linux/omap-timer.h |
| |
On 11/22/2013 09:33 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi, > > * Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [131121 18:00]: >> Multiplatform support has made arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/ inaccessible to >> drivers outside the plat-omap directory [1]. Due to this the following drivers >> are disabled with !CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM: >> CONFIG_IR_RX51 (drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c) >> CONFIG_TIDSPBRIDGE (drivers/staging/tidspbridge/core/dsp-clock.c) >> >> We move the portion of the dmtimer "API" that should be accessible to the >> drivers, into include/linux/omap-timer.h > > As we chatted earlier, we don't have to expose all these hardware specific > functions and use existing Linux generic frameworks instead. > > We can implement an irqchip and a clocksource in the dmtimer code for the > client drivers to use, and after that we only have a couple of dmtimer > specific functions left to export. > > I'm thinkging some thing like this for the public API: > > omap_dm_timer_request request_irq > omap_dm_timer_request_specific request_irq > omap_dm_timer_get_irq request_irq > omap_dm_timer_set_source clk_set_rate > omap_dm_timer_stop disable_irq > omap_dm_timer_start enable_irq > omap_dm_timer_disable disable_irq > omap_dm_timer_free free_irq > omap_dm_timer_set_int_enable enable_irq
Hi Tony,
The thing I feel we're trying to fit a square peg into round hole type of thing here.
Some reasons I feel this is overkill (point 2 makes it even not possible):
1. Ideally IR_RX51 should be using clockevents/hrtimer framework instead of irqchip. Other than that, dsp bridge is the only other user.
2. These functions will be also be required to be public once mach-omap2/timer.c moves to drivers/clocksource/ . At such an early point of code, we can't use irqchip anyway so we'd need these functions public.
3. This is a minor point, but its also not immediately intuitive or clear to someone who needs a dedicated hardware timer that they need to use an IRQ chip driver for the same. But we can avoid any discussion about this till we can discuss/agree on the above 2.
thanks,
-Joel
| |