lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1.1] x86: intel-mid: add test module for sfi_device()
Any comments on this?

Br, David

On 11/18/2013 09:37 AM, David Cohen wrote:
> On 11/18/2013 09:35 AM, David Cohen wrote:
>> On 11/18/2013 07:28 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 04:09:18PM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
>>>> This patch adds a test module to validate sfi_device() when used from a
>>>> driver module.
>>>
>>> I don't think this is all that useful. How about you prepeare a few
>>> of the more useful drivers from your tree for submission instead?
>>
>> One of these drivers you can track here:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3109791/
>> This is necessary to enable serial console on Saltbay (Merrifield based
>> platform). But the driver is still being reworked to be upstreamed.
>>
>> Anyway, upstream those drivers won't work to validate this patch set
>> we're discussion here. All platform codes are bool (can't be module).
>
> I meant: all upstreamed platform codes are bool.
>
>> The real purpose of these patches is to make my internal tree to be
>> equal to upstream. My intention is to upstream *all* internal patches
>> of Intel MID and temporarily move away from arch/x86/platform/intel-
>> mid/device_libs/ the platform code from still-on-staging-state drivers.
>>
>> So, we need a dummy module on upstream to make this code testable.
>>
>> In case this code is not accepted, I'll will have to maintain 2
>> official public branches: one with these patches and one without them.
>>
>> Br, David
>>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-21 19:41    [W:0.125 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site