lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: user defined OOM policies
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:

> OK, I was a bit vague it seems. I meant to give zonelist, gfp_mask,
> allocation order and nodemask parameters to the modules. So they have a
> better picture of what is the OOM context.
> What everything ould modules need to do an effective work is a matter
> for discussion.
>

It's an interesting idea but unfortunately a non-starter for us because
our users don't have root, we create their memcg tree and then chown it to
the user. They can freely register for oom notifications but cannot load
their own kernel modules for their own specific policy.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-21 05:01    [W:0.574 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site