Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:19:21 -0800 | From | Jacob Pan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cure some vaux idle wrackage |
| |
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:34:53 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:04:50PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I ran head-first into intel_powerclamp and acpi_pad yesterday -- > > afaict they try and do pretty much the same thing but both had > > competing sets of bugs and issues. > > > > Related to that I went over the tree looking for > > preempt_enable_no_resched() abuse. > > > > I know that patch 3 isn't going to be popular with Arjan but you > > guys are going to have to make that work. That stuff is hideously > > terrible. > > > > A note to Zhang Rui, _never_ merge EXPORTs in another maintainers' > > guts without an explicit ACK from him, Thomas was quite horrified > > when I asked him how tick_nohz_idle_{enter,exit} got exported. > > > > That said, thanks for a 'fun' two days :-( > > s/vaux/faux/ .. its been a long day.. and there's far too many dead > email addresses @intel.com Hi Peter, I cannot cleanly apply the patch set on upstream kernel. Failed on Subject: [PATCH 4/7] preempt, locking: Rework local_bh_{dis,en}able()
Can you tell me which commit id should I do git am?
Thanks,
Jacob
| |