Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:31:58 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: suspend/resume governors with PM notifiers | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 18 November 2013 16:27, Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> wrote: > How about introducing a resume/suspend callback pointer or list(if there > are several places that need to deal with cpu resume/suspend) in the > struct cpu and populate it in the cpufreq_add_dev()? > > The suspend/resume() of cpu_subsys needs to check the callback pointer > and run it if available.
That's almost a new infrastructure then and looks more hackish :) Apart from that even cpufreq would be a bit hacky as we don't really need per-cpu callbacks..
| |