Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:28:11 +0000 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mfd: Constify struct mfd_cell where possible |
| |
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > In the interests of bisectability and revertability, I'd prefer one > > patch per file-change where possible please. Or at the very least in > > groups of files, so one for tps*, another one for max*, etc. > > Done. More SoB-credits for me ;-)
You're welcome. :)
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |