lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Intel-gfx] kernel 3.11.6 general protection fault
    On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:45:18PM +0100, MPhil. Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
    > How - new libraries - more exhaustive algorythms - higher cpu usage
    > etc. Some of the things M$ is doing on purpose to force you upgrade
    > your hardware every 2-3years

    That would be too easy and machines would be dying left and right of
    overheating. Actually, sane hardware is much more robust than that and
    it throttles itself in case of critical temperature levels. And, IMHO
    your Dell Latitude D520 should be fine, in that respect. But we'll see.
    :-)

    > I wanted to first compile the kernel with the debug option you
    > mentioned, but while compiling it went to about 75°C.

    Yeah, that's still ok if we trust the output saying that 126°C is the
    critical temp.

    It would be interesting to see what this sensor says right before the
    machine locks up.

    HTH.

    --
    Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

    Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
    --
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-11-17 21:41    [W:2.773 / U:0.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site