lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] hwmon: (max6650) Add support for gpiodef
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:35:57PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:13:45PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:51:01PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> >> > > It is necessary for end users when they are using the gpio pins
> >> > connected to the
> >> > > fan controller. There is a separate gpiodef register provided, but it is
> >> > unused
> >> > > under the usual circumstances and that is probably the reason why this
> >> > feature
> >> > > has not been added before. It is necessary for our board to function
> >> > properly.
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp <lpapp@kde.org>
> >> > > ---
> >> > > Documentation/hwmon/max6650 | 5 +++
> >> > > drivers/hwmon/max6650.c | 107
> >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > > 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+)
> >> > >
> >> > > diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/max6650 b/Documentation/hwmon/max6650
> >> > > index 58d9644..32c69a8 100644
> >> > > --- a/Documentation/hwmon/max6650
> >> > > +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/max6650
> >> > > @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ pwm1 rw relative speed (0-255),
> >> > 255=max. speed.
> >> > > fan1_div rw sets the speed range the inputs can handle. Legal
> >> > > values are 1, 2, 4, and 8. Use lower values for
> >> > > faster fans.
> >> > > +gpio0 rw sets the gpio 0 PIN. Legal values are 0, 1, 2, and
> >> > 3.
> >> > > +gpio1 rw sets the gpio 1 PIN. Legal values are 0, 1, 2, and
> >> > 3.
> >> > > +gpio2 rw sets the gpio 2 PIN. Legal values are 0, 1, 2, and
> >> > 3.
> >> > > +gpio3 rw sets the gpio 3 PIN. Legal values are 0, and 1.
> >> > > +gpio4 rw sets the gpio 4 PIN. Legal values are 0, and 1.
> >> > >
> >> > gpio pins should be exported through the gpio subsystem, usually with a
> >> > gpio
> >> > driver. In this case, it may be acceptable to have the driver register with
> >> > the gpio subsystem to export the pins. Using local sysfs attributes is
> >> > wrong
> >> > and unacceptable.
> >> >
> >>
> >> In short: I am not sure.
> >>
> >> My concern is that these are not generic gpio pins. They seem to have chip
> >> specific functionality, like alarm, full-on, and clock (internal and
> >> external). Strictly speaking, one could even mention that to expose the
> >> GPIODEF register as is without splitting it into five separate gpio pin
> >> entries. Even those five pins behave slightly differently.
> >>
> >> I considered both, but these are the reasons why I decided to keep it chip
> >> specific rather than separately in a generic subsystem.
> >>
> > If the registers are not really gpio pins but are needed / used for chip
> > configuration, the other option would be to configure the values using platform
> > data and/or devicetree data. Either case, exporting the pins to user space via
> > sysfs attribute files in the device directory is the wrong approach.
>
> Hmm, that would not allow dynamic settings on its own - if I am not
> mistaken - which we are in need of. I might be mistaken tough, so
> please forgive my shortcomings.
>
> I was also thinking of module parameters before, as well. Perhaps that
> is a better approach. I am not sure. What do you think about it?
>
Problem with that is that it applies to all MAX6650's.

What are those pins used for ?
If they need to be set at runtime, gpio may be a choice after all.
I think I may need to get a better understanding of your use case.

Thanks,
Guenter


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-14 20:41    [W:0.066 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site