lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/03] gpio: rcar: Use lazy disable and mask on suspend
Date
Hi Magnus,

On Thursday 14 November 2013 17:50:09 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 November 2013 11:03:06 Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 14 November 2013 07:59:36 Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> >> From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> >> >>
> >> >> Set the ->irq_enable() and ->irq_disable() methods to NULL
> >> >> to enable lazy disable of interrupts.
> >> >
> >> > Is that just for optimization purpose, or is there another reason ?
> >>
> >> It is needed for IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND operation, which in turn is
> >> needed for Suspend-to-RAM.
> >>
> >> >> Also extend the code to set IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND which tells the
> >> >> core that only IRQs marked as wakeups need to stay enabled during
> >> >> Suspend-to-RAM.
> >> >
> >> > Shouldn't this be split to a separate patch ?
> >>
> >> I could split them up, but since there is a dependency and since I
> >> mainly care about making sure Suspend-to-RAM works I preferred to keep
> >> them together.
> >
> > Fine with me. Could you then please update the commit message to mention
> > that lazy disabling is required for IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND ? Same
> > comment for patch 03/03.
>
> Since when is it common practise to describe the dependencies for the
> various components included in a single commit?

It's common practice to describe the reason for a commit in the commit
message. In this case the two changes seemed unrelated at first sight, I
believe explained why they're both needed would be good.

> My opinion is that the person reading the code if requiring more information
> will have to grep for IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND in the friendly source code
> and learn how the subsystem is held together.
>
> In the case you have some special detailed commit message that you would
> like me to use then please feel free to propose that. If not then I will
> then split up the patches.

I would have use something like

"gpio: rcar: Use mask on suspend

Set IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND to tell the core that only IRQs marked as wakeups
need to stay enabled during Suspend-to-RAM. This requires lazy interrupt
disabling, so set the ->irq_enable() and ->irq_disable() methods to NULL."

Alternatively you can split the patches, I have no preference.

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-14 16:41    [W:0.047 / U:2.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site