[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: nohz problem with idle time on old hardware
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:31:34 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <> wrote:
> > The trace does indeed show that a tick is happening, as the config has
> > HZ=250 (4ms) and we see a tick happen every 4ms. But for some reason,
> > we don't update the the idle time correctly when nohz is enabled.
> >
> > When I say nohz is enabled, I mean that we don't have nohz=off in the
> > command line. There seems to be some difference between having nohz=off
> > and having nohz disabled at runtime.
> Looking at the differences between nohz=off from the command line, and
> disabled at run time seems to be the variable "tick_nohz_enabled". I
> don't see where it gets set to zero except for nohz=off.

Right. It's telling you if NOHZ is enabled. It's not telling you that
NOHZ is active.



 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-13 18:01    [W:0.125 / U:0.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site