[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:05:49AM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > What I'm not really convinced about is *how* you carry that metadata
> > in the DT, that's all, nothing more.
> Okay, I get you. My point is that being a crystal or not *is* a
> characteristic of the clock, so I think it could be part of the flags
> that describe it.

Yeah, but then, a crystal has a slightly different behaviour and
property than a oscillator, therefore the two aren't fully
"compatible" with each other.

> In any case, it's not really my call. This is about the clock and it's
> not even my home turf (wireless). ;)
> Thanks for your comments. And I'm sorry if the tone of my previous
> email sounded harsh, it was not supposed to. :)

That's fine, don't worry :)


Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-13 16:01    [W:0.067 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site