Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:02:14 +0100 (CET) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: nohz problem with idle time on old hardware |
| |
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Matthew Whitehead wrote:
> I was testing the 3.12 kernel on some _old_ hardware and I uncovered a bug. > It arises when nohz=on and goes away with nohz=off. On a crusty dual Pentium-1 > system that is completely idle, the sar utility reports 0% idle time on cpu0 > and 100% idle on cpu1. Cpu0 _should_ also be reporting 100% idle, but instead > it reports around 75% system time and 25% user time. > > The problem was diagnosed by Steve Rostedt with help from John > Stultz. The old system declares the dual TSCs unstable, and backs > down to a timesource of refined-jiffies. Apparently refined-jiffies > and jiffies are not a usable timesourcefor nohz, but we don't check > for that case because most modern systems have several reliable > hardware timesources.
Wrong.
> John suggested that we turn off nohz unless a usable hardware timesource is > present.
nohz already depends on two things:
1) A reliable clocksource which is valid for highres/nohz
2) A per cpu clockevent device which supports one shot mode.
and those are evaluated at runtime before we switch into NOHZ mode.
And neither jiffies nor refined-jiffies qualify as valid clocksource.
So there is something else wrong.
Thanks,
tglx
|  |