lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 15/17] microblaze: Convert from _fdt_start to __dtb_start
From
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote:
>>> QUESTION: The padding of the DTB is gone, is this OK?
>>
>> Removing this kernel padding should be fine. I can't remember
>> why it was there from the beginning.
>
> I know why is this here. The reason is process how dtb is passed
> to the kernel via command line. head.S code just copy that dtb to
> the same location where compiled-in dts is expected and kernel
> doesn't need to care about position of dtb because this copy is
> done without MMU. And the full kernel is covered by 2 tlbs and
> we don't need to use another TLB for dtb mapping.
>
> It means pad matters a lot. Because u-boot ITS format doesn't use
> simpleImage target but the kernel need to have a space for copying
> dtb to this kernel location.
>
> Let me think about if there is an easy way to handle dtbs
> which are passed from bootloader.

You can add to asm-generic/sections.h:

#ifndef ARCH_DTB_PADDING
#define ARCH_DTB_PADDING
#endif

and change KERNEL_DTB() to:

#define KERNEL_DTB() \
STRUCT_ALIGN(); \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__dtb_start) = .; \
*(.dtb.init.rodata) \
ARCH_DTB_PADDING \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__dtb_end) = .;

Then microblaze can predefine ARCH_DTB_PADDING in its
<asm/sections.h>.

Still, it will crash badly if the external DTB is larger than
ARCH_DTB_PADDING.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-13 15:21    [W:0.859 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site