Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Nov 2013 11:18:33 +0100 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] clockevents/clocksource: 3.12 fixes |
| |
On 11/12/2013 11:57 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:01:29PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ingo and Thomas, >>> >>> this pull request has the following contain: >>> >>> * Laurent Pinchard fixed a missing a clk_put in case the >>> registering of the sh_mtu[2] drivers fails. >>> >>> * Uwe Kleine-König reuse clockevents_config_and_register for the >>> at91rm9200_time timer as it was depending on the patch (commit >>> a4578ea (clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion). >>> >>> I don't know why Thomas's patch "clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec >>> conversion" appears in the request log because it is not part of the >>> patches interval I specified for git request pull. The diffstat does >>> not show the files which should have been changed by the patch. In >>> any case I kept the changelog untouched since it is what gives me >>> git and maybe someone can tell me why it appears. >> Look at: >> >> git log --oneline --graph --boundary 97b9410..42ab380 >> >> Then you see that there is Thomas' patch twice. Once the version he >> committed and sent to Linus (97b9410) and once the version that you get >> as part of my pull request (a4578ea). To fix this (assuming you don't >> care much about a stable tree), simply do: >> >> git rebase 97b9410 42ab380 >> >> and let the result pull. > > The whole misery starts that you decided to play maintainer and grab > some patches from the mailinglist and then offering them via a pull > request to me and others. Finally you tricked Daniel to take them, > which is a different issue. > > There is a reason why I ignored that pull request: > > I generally do not pull git trees from people who I'm not > trusting. And I have good reasons not to trust you at all. > > Aside of that, I decided to give you a chance and actually pulled > your tree into a temporary branch and found out that it's missing a > stable annotation. Which made the whole exercise go into /dev/null > > Now Linus pulled my version way before Daniel pulled your tree into > his. And you even commented on my commit that I forgot to add a > tested-by tag. Yes, I missed that in favour of the stable annotation. > > But instead of rebasing your tree or even just withdrawing it and > resending the at91 patch, you let Daniel pull your thing. > > Of course Daniel failed to detect the pointless commit in your pull > request at the point of merging it and then he starts asking questions > when he sends the pull request for his aggregated stuff .... > > There is a good reason why most maintainers have a strict policy from > whom they are pulling from and from whom they are just accepting > patches by mail. > > Daniel, please provide me a rebased version, but be more careful > versus integration of random pull requests next time.
Yes I will. Thanks for catching this.
I overwrote my branch with a rebased version.
The following changes since commit 97b9410643475d6557d2517c2aff9fd2221141a9:
clockevents: Sanitize ticks to nsec conversion (2013-10-23 12:51:21 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/linux.git clockevents/fixes
for you to fetch changes up to f578caebe38b87e7923cc03fb135d1e759912709:
clocksource: sh_tmu: Add clk_prepare/unprepare support (2013-11-13 11:06:50 +0100)
---------------------------------------------------------------- Laurent Pinchart (4): clocksource: sh_mtu2: Release clock when sh_mtu2_register() fails clocksource: sh_mtu2: Add clk_prepare/unprepare support clocksource: sh_tmu: Release clock when sh_tmu_register() fails clocksource: sh_tmu: Add clk_prepare/unprepare support
Uwe Kleine-König (1): ARM: at91: rm9200: switch back to clockevents_config_and_register
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_time.c | 7 ++----- drivers/clocksource/sh_mtu2.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- drivers/clocksource/sh_tmu.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |