lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH v5 05/14] sched: add a packing level knob
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:44:15AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 12 November 2013 11:32, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:52:18PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> +int sched_proc_update_packing(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> >> + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> >> + loff_t *ppos)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> >> + if (ret || !write)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (sysctl_sched_packing_level)
> >> + sd_pack_threshold = (100 * 1024) / sysctl_sched_packing_level;
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PACKING_TASKS
> >> +static int min_sched_packing_level;
> >> +static int max_sched_packing_level = 100;
> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> >
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PACKING_TASKS
> >> + {
> >> + .procname = "sched_packing_level",
> >> + .data = &sysctl_sched_packing_level,
> >> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> >> + .mode = 0644,
> >> + .proc_handler = sched_proc_update_packing,
> >> + .extra1 = &min_sched_packing_level,
> >> + .extra2 = &max_sched_packing_level,
> >> + },
> >> +#endif
> >
> > Shouldn't min_sched_packing_level be 1? Userspace can now write 0 and
> > expect something; but then we don't update sd_pack_threshold so nothing
> > really changed.
>
> value 0 is used to disable to packing feature and the scheduler falls
> back to default behavior. This value is tested when setting which cpus
> will be used by the scheduler.

I suspected as much, but it wasn't clear from the Changelog, the patch
or any comments. Plz as to fix.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-12 12:21    [W:0.100 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site