Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:08:02 -0400 | From | Neil Horman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's |
| |
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:42:46PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 14:30 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > [...] > > It > > functions, but unfortunately the performance lost to the completely broken > > branch prediction that this inflicts makes it a non starter: > [...] > > Conditional branches are no good but conditional moves might be worth a shot. > > Ben. > How would you suggest replacing the jumps in this case? I agree it would be faster here, but I'm not sure how I would implement an increment using a single conditional move. Neil
> -- > Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare > Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. > They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked. > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
|  |