lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Strange location and name for platform devices when device-tree is used.
From
Date
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 16:03 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:

> Do you mean we could allow multiple devices on the one bus to have the same
> name, but get sysfs to notice and de-duplicate by mangling one name? I don't
> think I like that but I might have misunderstood.

What other option do we have ?

> On my device I seem to have some platform devices registered through
> device-tree, and some registered through platform_device_add (e.g.
> 'alarmtimer'). Guaranteeing they remain disjoint sets if the kernel is
> allowed to evolve independently of the devicetree might be tricky....
> Maybe we need "/sys/devices/platform" and "/sys/devices/dt_platform" ??

No, I think device-tree created platform devices should go
to /sys/devices/platform like the "classic" ones.

The problem is really how to deal with potential name duplication. We
could try to register, if we get -EEXIST (assuming sysfs returns the
right stuff), try again with ".1" etc...

> Hoping someone who understands the device model better than me will help.

Greg ? :-)

.../...

> The 'backlight' device is a virtual device. It uses a 'pwm' device to
> provide the variable brightness to the back light.
>
> The 'pwm' device itself is virtual, making use of a 'dmtimer' to provide the
> timing... The timer device (timer11 in omap3.dtsi) has a 'reg' property.
>
> A random example from current mainline is
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evmsk.dts
> which has 'backlight' as a virtual device compatible with pwm-backlight.
> It also has 'gpio-keys', 'gpio-leds', and 'regulator-fixed' compatible
> virtual devices. They seem fairly common.

Ok.

Cheers,
Ben.

> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ben.
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ben.
> > >
> > > > Any help understanding and/or fixing this discrepancy greatly appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > The change of name is particularly annoying to me because one of my platform
> > > > devices is a pwm_bl.c backlight. With a boardfile I
> > > > get /sys/class/pwm_backlight. With devicetree the best I can get
> > > > is /sys/class/pwm_backlight.23 (or similar). It would be really nice to have
> > > > a more stable and sensible name here.
> > >
> >
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-11-01 06:41    [W:0.091 / U:5.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site