lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC] perf: mmap2 not covering VM_CLONE regions
From
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:04:38PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> Ok, so I tried this. It does not cover shmat() cases unfortunately.
>> We need that same ++global_mm_id somewhere on that code path.
>> Haven't looked at it in details just yet.
>
> shmat() is a regular shared memory thingy right? So that should be
> covered by the regular inode,dev bits, right?

Yes, it is but I am trying to see whether or not we could unify that and
use a single u64 number to uniquely identify each mapping.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-08 09:41    [W:0.106 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site