lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure
On 10/04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:06:53PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > However, yes-yes-yes, I do think that we need the non-exclusive mode
> > too, at least for percpu_down_write_nonexclusive() which I think we
> > need as well.
>
> I just need to disagree with the write_nonexclusive() name; the
> construct I quite understand and could even agree with.
>
> How about something like:

I am fine either way ;)

> At which point I start to have doubts about the percpu prefix.. ;-)

Yes... and "percpu" just refers to implementation details, this is
pointless.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-10-05 20:01    [W:0.116 / U:2.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site