Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Oct 2013 19:31:36 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure |
| |
On 10/04, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:06:53PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > However, yes-yes-yes, I do think that we need the non-exclusive mode > > too, at least for percpu_down_write_nonexclusive() which I think we > > need as well. > > I just need to disagree with the write_nonexclusive() name; the > construct I quite understand and could even agree with. > > How about something like:
I am fine either way ;)
> At which point I start to have doubts about the percpu prefix.. ;-)
Yes... and "percpu" just refers to implementation details, this is pointless.
Oleg.
| |