lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] FPGA subsystem core
    On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 04:33:41PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

    > > I agree that the firmware interface makes sense when the use of the
    > > FPGA is an implementation detail in a fixed hardware configuration,
    > > but that is a fairly restricted use case all things considered.
    >
    > Ideally I thought this would be just like "firmware", you dump the file
    > to the FPGA, it validates it and away you go with a new image running in
    > the chip.

    That is 99% of the use cases. The other stuff people are talking about
    is fringe.

    I've been doing FPGAs for > 10 years and I've never once used read back
    via the config bus. In fact all my FPGAs turn that feature off once
    they are loaded.

    Partial reconfiguration is very specialized, and hard to use from a
    FPGA design standpoint.

    I also think it is sensible to focus this interface on simple SRAM
    FPGAs, not FLASH based stuff, or whatever complex device required a
    byte code interpreter (never heard of that before).

    Jason


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-10-05 02:21    [W:3.741 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site