Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:08:11 +0100 | From | Johan Hovold <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/9] backlight: atmel-pwm-bl: fix gpio polarity in remove |
| |
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:09:28PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 11:55 Wed 23 Oct , Johan Hovold wrote: > > Make sure to honour gpio polarity also at remove so that the backlight > > is actually disabled on boards with active-low enable pin. > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c > > index 8aac273..3cb0094 100644 > > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c > > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/atmel-pwm-bl.c > > @@ -205,8 +205,10 @@ static int atmel_pwm_bl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > struct atmel_pwm_bl *pwmbl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > > > - if (pwmbl->gpio_on != -1) > > - gpio_set_value(pwmbl->gpio_on, 0); > > + if (pwmbl->gpio_on != -1) { > here we need to use gpio_is_valid
That is a different issue which is fixed by patch 7/9. It doesn't make sense to only change one of the gpio-validity tests.
Johan
> > + gpio_set_value(pwmbl->gpio_on, > > + 0 ^ pwmbl->pdata->on_active_low); > > + } > > pwm_channel_disable(&pwmbl->pwmc); > > pwm_channel_free(&pwmbl->pwmc); > > > > -- > > 1.8.4 > >
| |