Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:19:07 -0600 | From | David Ahern <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Add new comm infrastructure |
| |
On 10/25/13 12:12 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Oh I see. It's possible that my massive conversion to use the comm > accessor got blind at some point and left over a few things. I > remember that I only lightly tested that new comm infrastructure. I > mean I tested a lot of "perf report -s foo,bar" combinations for > performance comparisons but I haven't tested the perf script and all > the other perf tools. > > I'll rebase these patches and test that wider before resending.
specifically, I see stuff like perf forking ls and comm still shows as perf even though there is COMM record with the rename to ls. I believe the test case was something like:
perf sched record -- ls perf script
David
| |